Discussion on the recommended fixes

All questions or things you think are wrong about the new book to be posted here. Will collate into a long list and get it sent off after a while!

Moderators: Rangers, Leaders

Standard Bearer
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:31 am

Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:16 pm

So in each 'Collated questions' thread I have given 'recommended ' fixes/answers based upon how I see it.

I would appreciate any discussion on the matter, any that you think I have ruled wrong, and why.

I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but currently going through it atm.

User avatar
Istari
 
Posts: 1428
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:56 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:24 pm

Q4) When both armed with shields, the Rider of the Dead has D7 and the Warrior of the Dead D8, shouldn't they be the same?

Currently they are different. One way of thinking about it is that the rider cannot use his shield to his full potential whilst on horse back. Potential fix is to allow the purchase of a shield for 1pt, thus making them D8


Don't agree with the 'One way way of thinking...' or you would have to apply the same logic to all cavalry.

Standard Bearer
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:28 pm

I don't think GW would errata them to D8 though. I can't really see a way to do it that GW would flow with too, which was one consideration when making my guesses...?

User avatar
Istari
 
Posts: 1428
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:56 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:07 pm

They will probably just say that the 'errors' were intended just as they did with LoME anyway :)

Standard Bearer
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:09 pm

hithero wrote:They will probably just say that the 'errors' were intended just as they did with LoME anyway :)


Exactly. That's why I think adding the option for a shield is a reasonable fix?

Standard Bearer
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:10 pm

Just updated 'Kingdoms of Men' questions, as well as Mordor. Please look over!

And now Fallen realms too.

Warrior
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:33 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:05 pm

ukrocky wrote:Just updated 'Kingdoms of Men' questions, as well as Mordor. Please look over!

And now Fallen realms too.


Are you guys only talking to each other, or is there a place we can see these? :)

Standard Bearer
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:52 pm

In the collated question stickys! I talk to myself aplenty though :P

Warrior
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:33 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:12 pm

I see the collated threads, but they have a padlock and show zero posts.

Standard Bearer
 
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:31 am

Re: Discussion on the recommended fixes

Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:16 pm

whafrog wrote:I see the collated threads, but they have a padlock and show zero posts.


You should still be able to view them and the first post in them, it's just so they don't become clogged up, that's what the discussion threads are for :)

Next
Return to FAQ for the 2012 SBG Books

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest